Files
collective-memory-repo/daily/2026-03-10.md

27 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

2026-03-10

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0001.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0001.md

Session: 2026-03-10 00:01:12 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: 2d840eab-5ec5-4d1e-817e-a0a0ecbf2b42
  • Source: webchat

Conversation Summary

user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 4:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 20:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 4:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 20:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 5:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 21:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 5:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 21:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 6:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 22:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 6:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 22:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 7:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 23:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 7:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 23:39 UTC

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0644.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0644.md

Session: 2026-03-10 06:44:48 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: 4a686469-00c9-4637-bbf8-fbe19b086ff3
  • Source: webchat

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0645.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0645.md

Session: 2026-03-10 06:45:05 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: d016f33a-9a43-4998-b835-2c7a5eba8ff6
  • Source: webchat

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-install.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-install.md

Session: 2026-03-10 07:00:21 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: 8a4e29cf-c468-4279-94bc-32503674dea3
  • Source: webchat

Conversation Summary

user: A new session was started via /new or /reset. Execute your Session Startup sequence now - read the required files before responding to the user. Then greet the user in your configured persona, if one is provided. Be yourself - use your defined voice, mannerisms, and mood. Keep it to 1-3 sentences and ask what they want to do. If the runtime model differs from default_model in the system prompt, mention the default model. Do not mention internal steps, files, tools, or reasoning. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:45 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:45 UTC assistant: reply_to_current 你好hotwa。我是 Claw今天也在 mac-5 控制面值班,风格还是直接一点、务实一点。想先做什么? user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:48 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:48 UTC assistant: reply_to_current OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:本机 Gateway 当前无法连通(ws://127.0.0.1:187891006 abnormal closure所以 openclaw healthopenclaw nodes status --connected 都失败了,暂时无法确认 mac-6 / mac-7 在线状态。建议先执行的第一步修复是:在 mac-5 上检查 Gateway 状态并重启,依次运行 openclaw gateway statusopenclaw gateway restart。 user: Sender (untrusted metadata):

{
  "label": "openclaw-control-ui",
  "id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}

[Tue 2026-03-10 14:55 GMT+8] npm 安装 clawdhub的npm命令给我 assistant: reply_to_current 如果你是指 clawhubnpm 全局安装命令是:

npm i -g clawhub

装完可以顺手验一下:

clawhub --version

如果你真的是指别的包名(比如 clawdhub 不是手误),把准确名字发我,我给你确认。

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-rate-limit.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-rate-limit.md

Session: 2026-03-10 06:42:06 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: 61bb3313-c015-46ba-84b3-c55ff9ac1e9c
  • Source: webchat

Conversation Summary

user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 1:08 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 05:08 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:

  • Gateway 健康检查失败
  • 节点连接状态检查失败
  • 当前报错:本地连接 ws://127.0.0.1:18789 被异常关闭1006 abnormal closure

这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8 正常。建议先执行:

openclaw gateway status

如果还没恢复,再执行:

openclaw doctor

user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 1:38 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 05:38 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:

  • Gateway 健康检查失败
  • 节点连接状态检查失败
  • 当前报错:本地连接 ws://127.0.0.1:18789 被异常关闭1006 abnormal closure

这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8 正常。建议先执行:

openclaw gateway status

如果还没恢复,再执行:

openclaw doctor

user: Sender (untrusted metadata):

{
  "label": "openclaw-control-ui",
  "id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}

[Tue 2026-03-10 13:41 GMT+8] 分析一下限制流量原因? assistant: 我先查一下本地文档里有没有 ClawHub 限流或鉴权相关说明,再给你一个靠谱判断。 assistant: reply_to_current 大概率就是 ClawHub 对未登录/匿名请求做了频率限制,不是你本机网络或 Node 的锅。

我刚检查了两点:

  • 本地文档里有 clawhub login / whoami / --token,说明 ClawHub CLI 本身区分登录态
  • 你当前 clawhub whoami 返回:
    • Not logged in. Run: clawhub login

结合你之前的报错:

  • Resolving self-improving
  • Rate limit exceeded

基本可以判断为:

最可能原因

  1. 你现在是未登录状态

    • 匿名搜索/安装额度更低
    • 热门 skill 或短时间重复请求,更容易打到限流
  2. 短时间内请求过多

    • 你前面连续做了 search、install、retry
    • 这很像触发了服务端的窗口限流
  3. 这个 slug 比较热门

    • self-improving 这种短 slug 访问量可能本来就高
    • 在匿名模式下更容易被限

不是主要原因的项

这些我反而觉得不是核心原因

  • 不是 Node 22 / Node 24 版本问题
  • 不是 fnm / brew 切换问题
  • 不是 workspace 路径问题
  • 不是 OpenClaw 本体问题

因为报错发生在 ClawHub 解析/下载阶段,不是本地执行阶段。


我建议你怎么处理

方案 1先登录 ClawHub再装

最靠谱。

clawhub login
clawhub whoami
cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults

如果你有 token也可以

clawhub login --token <your-token>

方案 2等 15 分钟再试

如果只是时间窗口限流,等一下通常就过了。

cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults

方案 3换一个不那么热门的同类 skill

比如:

clawhub install self-improving-agent-cn --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults

或者:

clawhub install xiucheng-self-improving-agent --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults

我的判断

根因优先级我会这么排:

  1. 未登录匿名限流
  2. 短时间重复请求触发窗口限流
  3. 目标 skill 热门导致公共额度更紧

如果你想,我下一条可以直接给你一套**“先登录,再安装 self-improving”的最短命令清单**。 user: Sender (untrusted metadata):

{
  "label": "openclaw-control-ui",
  "id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}

[Tue 2026-03-10 13:42 GMT+8] clawhub login 如何注册账号? assistant: reply_to_current clawhub login 本身主要是登录,不是在终端里走完整注册流程。一般做法是:

最直接的方式

先执行:

clawhub login

它通常会:

  • 打开浏览器
  • 跳到 ClawHub 的网页登录页
  • 你如果还没账号,就在网页里先注册
  • 注册完回到授权/登录流程

如果浏览器没自动开

你可以先自己去网站:

https://clawhub.com

或者文档里提到的:

https://clawhub.ai

先在网页上注册账号,然后回来执行:

clawhub login

登录完怎么确认

clawhub whoami

如果登录成功,它会显示当前账号信息。


如果你有 token

也可以不用浏览器,直接:

clawhub login --token <your-token>

但前提是你已经先在网页上有账号,并拿到了 token。


我建议你这样走

按这个顺序最省事:

clawhub login
clawhub whoami
cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults

如果你愿意,我下一条可以直接告诉你:登录网页里应该点哪里注册,以及登录成功后怎么继续装 skill。 user: Sender (untrusted metadata):

{
  "label": "openclaw-control-ui",
  "id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}

[Tue 2026-03-10 13:53 GMT+8] clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults ✔ OK. Installed self-improving -> /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/skills/self-improving| 我已经登录并且安装成功了。然后接下来我需要更新记忆系统了。将当前记忆系统给我介绍一下。另外mac-8机器已经下线剔除记忆系统了。现在我有一套新的工作系统~/project/qmd-memory-gateway . 看下这个目录系统设计我准备应用到当前的系统的openclawd上面去。另外我现在是要将 mac mini现在只有 mac-5mac-6mac-7 三个了,我觉得这个 ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 记忆系统适合每台机器有自己的gateway还是和之前一样使用mac-5共用一个gateway assistant: 我先看一下现有记忆系统脉络,再快速过一遍 ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 的结构,最后给你一个迁移建议。 assistant: reply_to_current 可以,我先把这三件事拆开讲:

1. 你当前 openclawd 的记忆系统,实际上是什么

现在这套更像是 “文件分层 + OpenClaw 内置 memory_search/qmd 检索”,不是一个独立的 memory-gateway 系统。

当前设计特点

  • 入口层
    • MEMORY.md:长期记忆索引,偏 distilled summary
    • memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md:每日流水
  • 专题层
    • memory/infra.md
    • memory/projects.md
    • memory/lessons.md
  • 工作区层
    • 你现在的 ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json 里配置了 qmd memory paths
    • 之前是把 sharedmac-5mac-6mac-7mac-8 都作为检索路径
    • 现在你已经把 mac-8 从配置和 vault 里剔掉了

这套系统的优点

  • 简单,直接,和 OpenClaw 原生机制贴得很近
  • 不需要额外服务就能工作
  • 适合单控制面 + 少量节点

当前这套的短板

  • 一致性弱
    • 谁先写、谁后搜,不一定严格同步
  • 结构上偏“文件仓库”,不是“查询前事务系统”
  • 跨机器/跨分支隔离弱
    • 更像“把很多目录丢给 qmd 去搜”
    • 而不是按 branch/profile/workspace 做强隔离
  • 写入规范还在,但检索入口不够强约束
    • 容易出现“搜到了,但不知道是哪个时点、哪个分支、哪个任务态”的问题

2. ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 这套系统设计,适不适合你

我看完后,结论很明确:

这套设计比你现在的 OpenClaw 记忆系统更工程化,也更适合你这种多机、多任务、强调一致性的场景。

它的核心思想

不是“让 qmd 直接搜目录”,而是:

  • Git 是唯一真相源
  • QMD 只负责索引和检索
  • memory-gateway 负责:查询前同步 + workspace 隔离 + 一致性保证

也就是这个顺序:

sync git -> workspace sync -> qmd update/embed -> query

这个设计我挺认同,原因很直接:

它解决了你现在最缺的三件事

1) 查询一致性

你现在最怕的是:

  • A agent 读到旧记忆
  • B agent 读到新记忆
  • 然后行为分叉

而这套 gateway 把“同步”强行放进查询链路里了。这个方向是对的。

2) 分支隔离

它明确反对:

  • 单目录频繁 checkout 不同 branch

改成:

  • main
  • memory/YYYY-MM
  • task/<task-id>

每个 branch 一个独立 workspace。
这非常适合你的“长期记忆 / 月度记忆 / 任务记忆”三层模型。

3) 可追溯

查询返回里带:

  • branch
  • commit_hash
  • synced_at
  • resolved_workspace

这个非常关键。
你以后问“为什么它读到这个结论”,就能追到具体记忆快照。


3. mac-8 下线以后,这套新系统该怎么部署?

你现在机器集合已经变成:

  • mac-5:控制面
  • mac-6:执行节点
  • mac-7:浏览器/验证节点

mac-8 已经剔除了。这个变化其实让我更偏向一个结论:

我的建议:继续只保留 mac-5 一个 Gateway

也就是:

  • OpenClaw Gateway仍然只在 mac-5
  • memory-gateway / qmd 记忆系统:也优先部署在 mac-5
  • mac-6 / mac-7 继续作为执行节点,不各自跑自己的 gateway

为什么我不建议每台机器一个 gateway

1) 你原来的架构原则本来就是单控制面

你现在现有记忆里最重要的一条就是:

  • 控制面唯一 Gateway 在 mac-5
  • 其它机器只做 Node Host

这个原则其实是对的。
如果你现在为了 memory system 又变成每台机器一套 gateway会把控制面重新打散。

2) 多 gateway 会把“记忆一致性”问题放大,而不是缩小

如果每台机器都有自己的 gateway

  • mac-5 一个 memory-gateway
  • mac-6 一个 memory-gateway
  • mac-7 一个 memory-gateway

那你马上会遇到:

  • 谁是 memory repo 的真相源?
  • 谁负责写入合并?
  • 查询打到哪个 gateway
  • 分支同步谁先谁后?
  • 各自 qmd cache/index 怎么保持一致?

这套复杂度对现在三台机器来说,不值当

3) 你这个项目本身就更像“集中式记忆协调层”

qmd-memory-gateway 的设计本质是:

  • 一个统一的 memory-gateway
  • 一个统一的 git mirror / workspaces / qmd cache
  • 客户端远程调用它

这天然更适合:

  • 中心化部署
  • 而不是多机各自一套分布式网关

4) mac-6 / mac-7 更适合作为“执行资源”,不是“记忆真相源”

它们更像:

  • mac-6跑构建/命令
  • mac-7跑浏览器验证

而记忆系统应该更像控制面基础设施,放在 mac-5 更合理。


所以我给你的明确建议

推荐架构

方案 A我推荐

  • OpenClaw Gateway仅 mac-5
  • memory-gateway仅 mac-5
  • QMD 服务:仅 mac-5
  • memory git repo集中放在 mac-5
  • mac-6 / mac-7 通过 OpenClaw 节点机制被调度
  • 所有 agent 的记忆检索统一经由 mac-5 的 memory-gateway

这套是最稳的。


不推荐方案

方案 B每台机器一个 gateway

不推荐,除非你明确要做:

  • 多控制面容灾
  • 机房级隔离
  • 每台机器独立自治
  • 复杂的分布式记忆路由

你现在这个规模,不需要。


一个更现实的折中方案

方案 C单 Gateway多 agent memory namespace

也就是:

  • Gateway 还是只有 mac-5 一个
  • memory repo 里做多 agent / 多 machine 分层
  • 例如:
    • shared/
    • agents/mac-5-control/
    • agents/mac-6-executor/
    • agents/mac-7-browser/
    • task/<task-id>/
    • memory/YYYY-MM

这个比“每台机器一个 gateway”强太多因为

  • 控制面还是统一
  • 记忆空间又能隔离
  • 查询前同步也容易做

这其实和 qmd-memory-gateway 自己 README 里的方向是一致的。


我对迁移的具体判断

适合迁移的部分

你可以把下面这些思想迁进当前 openclawd

  • Git 真相源
  • branch/profile 驱动的 memory 视图
  • workspace 隔离
  • 查询前同步
  • 返回 commit_hash / synced_at / workspace
  • shared + per-agent 目录结构

不建议直接照搬的部分

你现在不需要立刻上:

  • 每台机器独立 gateway
  • 分布式 memory-gateway 集群
  • 多个 qmd 实例分散在各节点

先别把架构做复杂。


结合你当前情况,我会这样定方向

新的基础认知

  • mac-8 已永久下线
  • 当前集群只剩:
    • mac-5
    • mac-6
    • mac-7
  • 控制面仍建议只保留 mac-5
  • 新记忆系统优先做成:
    • mac-5 上集中式 memory-gateway
    • 其下管理多 agent / 多 machine 的 memory namespace

我对“当前记忆系统”更新的建议

你接下来应该更新的不是单一文件,而是这几层:

1) MEMORY.md

把集群角色从:

  • mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8

改成:

  • mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7
  • 明确 mac-8 已下线并从记忆系统剔除

2) memory/infra.md

补上:

  • 新的三机拓扑
  • 单 Gateway 仍在 mac-5
  • 准备引入 qmd-memory-gateway 作为新记忆架构候选
  • 原则:不在 mac-6 / mac-7 启第二个 OpenClaw Gateway

3) memory/projects.md

补一个迁移任务:

  • 评估并迁移 ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 到当前 openclawd
  • 先做单控制面版本
  • 后面再看是否扩展 per-agent namespace

最终结论

我的判断很明确:

  • qmd-memory-gateway 这套设计值得迁入当前 openclawd
  • mac-8 已下线,应从长期记忆里正式删除
  • 不建议每台机器一个 gateway
  • 继续保持 mac-5 为唯一 Gateway
  • 新记忆系统应该做成:
    • 集中式 memory-gateway on mac-5
    • 多 workspace / 多 branch / 多 agent namespace
    • mac-6、mac-7 继续只是执行节点

如果你要,我下一步可以直接帮你做两件事之一:

  1. 先帮你写一版“新的记忆系统目标架构文档”
  2. 直接帮你更新 MEMORY.md / memory/infra.md / memory/projects.md user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:08 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:08 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:
  • Gateway 健康检查失败
  • 节点连接状态检查失败
  • 当前报错:本地连接 ws://127.0.0.1:18789 被异常关闭1006 abnormal closure

这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7 正常。建议先执行:

openclaw gateway status

如果还没恢复,再执行:

openclaw doctor

user: Sender (untrusted metadata):

{
  "label": "openclaw-control-ui",
  "id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}

[Tue 2026-03-10 14:35 GMT+8] qmd-memory-gateway 这套设计值得迁入当前 openclawd mac-8 已下线,应从长期记忆里正式删除 不建议每台机器一个 gateway 继续保持 mac-5 为唯一 Gateway 新记忆系统应该做成: 集中式 memory-gateway on mac-5 多 workspace / 多 branch / 多 agent namespace mac-6、mac-7 继续只是执行节点|给我后续的操作步骤(完整详细)我需要交个本机的子执行。我给提示词

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-node-health.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-node-health.md

Session: 2026-03-10 00:13:46 UTC

  • Session Key: agent:main:main
  • Session ID: b8adb290-dcfa-49f4-862d-c327dde8dfdd
  • Source: webchat

Conversation Summary

user: A new session was started via /new or /reset. Execute your Session Startup sequence now - read the required files before responding to the user. Then greet the user in your configured persona, if one is provided. Be yourself - use your defined voice, mannerisms, and mood. Keep it to 1-3 sentences and ask what they want to do. If the runtime model differs from default_model in the system prompt, mention the default model. Do not mention internal steps, files, tools, or reasoning. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:01 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:01 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:09 UTC assistant:

assistant:

🛠️ Node Health Alert

Only Browser Node (mac-7) is currently connected (7m ago).

mac-6 (Executor) and mac-8 (Validator) are not showing as paired or connected. They may have been unpaired or the pairing was lost.

Next steps:

  1. Check if mac-6 and mac-8 are online
  2. Re-pair them if needed: openclaw node run/install on each machine
  3. Approve the pairing on mac-5 gateway

Should I help you re-pair these nodes, or do you want to investigate what happened?

Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10.md

  • imported_at_utc: 2026-03-10T07:53:38Z
  • source_path: /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10.md

2026-03-10

OpenClaw cluster connectivity recovery

  • Verified that mac-6 and mac-7 are reachable only when CLI commands explicitly use --url wss://bot.jmsu.top with the configured gateway token.
  • Root cause split into two layers:
    • Local CLI default path on mac-5 still tried ws://127.0.0.1:18789, which failed with 1006 abnormal closure / ECONNREFUSED because the current gateway bind is tailnet and local loopback was not serving RPC.
    • mac-6 / mac-7 were initially on older node-host versions and failed remote execution with node command not allowed: system.run.prepare.
  • After upgrading both node hosts to v2026.3.8, explicit remote control via wss://bot.jmsu.top succeeded.
  • Validation after upgrade:
    • openclaw nodes status --connected --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token> showed both nodes paired and connected.
    • openclaw nodes run --node "Executor Node (mac-6)" --raw "echo ok" --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token> returned ok.
    • openclaw nodes run --node "Browser Node (mac-7)" --raw "echo ok" --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token> returned ok.
  • Remaining issue:
    • openclaw health on mac-5 still follows the local default path and fails against ws://127.0.0.1:18789; this means local default control routing is still misaligned with the active remote ingress path.
  • Durable lesson:
    • For this deployment, remote control path (wss://bot.jmsu.top) can be healthy while local default CLI health checks still fail.
    • When node connectivity looks broken, first separate: (1) gateway path selection, (2) node-host version compatibility.