27 KiB
2026-03-10
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0001.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0001.md
Session: 2026-03-10 00:01:12 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: 2d840eab-5ec5-4d1e-817e-a0a0ecbf2b42
- Source: webchat
Conversation Summary
user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 4:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 20:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 4:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 20:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 5:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 21:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 5:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 21:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 6:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 22:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 6:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 22:39 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 7:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 23:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 7:39 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-09 23:39 UTC
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0644.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0644.md
Session: 2026-03-10 06:44:48 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: 4a686469-00c9-4637-bbf8-fbe19b086ff3
- Source: webchat
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0645.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-0645.md
Session: 2026-03-10 06:45:05 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: d016f33a-9a43-4998-b835-2c7a5eba8ff6
- Source: webchat
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-install.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-install.md
Session: 2026-03-10 07:00:21 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: 8a4e29cf-c468-4279-94bc-32503674dea3
- Source: webchat
Conversation Summary
user: A new session was started via /new or /reset. Execute your Session Startup sequence now - read the required files before responding to the user. Then greet the user in your configured persona, if one is provided. Be yourself - use your defined voice, mannerisms, and mood. Keep it to 1-3 sentences and ask what they want to do. If the runtime model differs from default_model in the system prompt, mention the default model. Do not mention internal steps, files, tools, or reasoning.
Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:45 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:45 UTC
assistant: reply_to_current 你好,hotwa。我是 Claw,今天也在 mac-5 控制面值班,风格还是直接一点、务实一点。想先做什么?
user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md.
Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:48 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:48 UTC
assistant: reply_to_current OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:本机 Gateway 当前无法连通(ws://127.0.0.1:18789,1006 abnormal closure),所以 openclaw health 和 openclaw nodes status --connected 都失败了,暂时无法确认 mac-6 / mac-7 在线状态。建议先执行的第一步修复是:在 mac-5 上检查 Gateway 状态并重启,依次运行 openclaw gateway status 和 openclaw gateway restart。
user: Sender (untrusted metadata):
{
"label": "openclaw-control-ui",
"id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}
[Tue 2026-03-10 14:55 GMT+8] npm 安装 clawdhub的npm命令给我 assistant: reply_to_current 如果你是指 clawhub,npm 全局安装命令是:
npm i -g clawhub
装完可以顺手验一下:
clawhub --version
如果你真的是指别的包名(比如 clawdhub 不是手误),把准确名字发我,我给你确认。
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-rate-limit.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-clawhub-rate-limit.md
Session: 2026-03-10 06:42:06 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: 61bb3313-c015-46ba-84b3-c55ff9ac1e9c
- Source: webchat
Conversation Summary
user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 1:08 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 05:08 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:
- Gateway 健康检查失败
- 节点连接状态检查失败
- 当前报错:本地连接
ws://127.0.0.1:18789被异常关闭(1006 abnormal closure)
这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8 正常。建议先执行:
openclaw gateway status
如果还没恢复,再执行:
openclaw doctor
user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 1:38 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 05:38 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:
- Gateway 健康检查失败
- 节点连接状态检查失败
- 当前报错:本地连接
ws://127.0.0.1:18789被异常关闭(1006 abnormal closure)
这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8 正常。建议先执行:
openclaw gateway status
如果还没恢复,再执行:
openclaw doctor
user: Sender (untrusted metadata):
{
"label": "openclaw-control-ui",
"id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}
[Tue 2026-03-10 13:41 GMT+8] 分析一下限制流量原因? assistant: 我先查一下本地文档里有没有 ClawHub 限流或鉴权相关说明,再给你一个靠谱判断。 assistant: reply_to_current 大概率就是 ClawHub 对未登录/匿名请求做了频率限制,不是你本机网络或 Node 的锅。
我刚检查了两点:
- 本地文档里有
clawhub login / whoami / --token,说明 ClawHub CLI 本身区分登录态 - 你当前
clawhub whoami返回:Not logged in. Run: clawhub login
结合你之前的报错:
Resolving self-improvingRate limit exceeded
基本可以判断为:
最可能原因
-
你现在是未登录状态
- 匿名搜索/安装额度更低
- 热门 skill 或短时间重复请求,更容易打到限流
-
短时间内请求过多
- 你前面连续做了 search、install、retry
- 这很像触发了服务端的窗口限流
-
这个 slug 比较热门
self-improving这种短 slug 访问量可能本来就高- 在匿名模式下更容易被限
不是主要原因的项
这些我反而觉得不是核心原因:
- 不是 Node 22 / Node 24 版本问题
- 不是 fnm / brew 切换问题
- 不是 workspace 路径问题
- 不是 OpenClaw 本体问题
因为报错发生在 ClawHub 解析/下载阶段,不是本地执行阶段。
我建议你怎么处理
方案 1:先登录 ClawHub,再装
最靠谱。
clawhub login
clawhub whoami
cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
如果你有 token,也可以:
clawhub login --token <your-token>
方案 2:等 1–5 分钟再试
如果只是时间窗口限流,等一下通常就过了。
cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
方案 3:换一个不那么热门的同类 skill
比如:
clawhub install self-improving-agent-cn --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
或者:
clawhub install xiucheng-self-improving-agent --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
我的判断
根因优先级我会这么排:
- 未登录匿名限流
- 短时间重复请求触发窗口限流
- 目标 skill 热门导致公共额度更紧
如果你想,我下一条可以直接给你一套**“先登录,再安装 self-improving”的最短命令清单**。 user: Sender (untrusted metadata):
{
"label": "openclaw-control-ui",
"id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}
[Tue 2026-03-10 13:42 GMT+8] clawhub login 如何注册账号?
assistant: reply_to_current clawhub login 本身主要是登录,不是在终端里走完整注册流程。一般做法是:
最直接的方式
先执行:
clawhub login
它通常会:
- 打开浏览器
- 跳到 ClawHub 的网页登录页
- 你如果还没账号,就在网页里先注册
- 注册完回到授权/登录流程
如果浏览器没自动开
你可以先自己去网站:
https://clawhub.com
或者文档里提到的:
https://clawhub.ai
先在网页上注册账号,然后回来执行:
clawhub login
登录完怎么确认
clawhub whoami
如果登录成功,它会显示当前账号信息。
如果你有 token
也可以不用浏览器,直接:
clawhub login --token <your-token>
但前提是你已经先在网页上有账号,并拿到了 token。
我建议你这样走
按这个顺序最省事:
clawhub login
clawhub whoami
cd /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
如果你愿意,我下一条可以直接告诉你:登录网页里应该点哪里注册,以及登录成功后怎么继续装 skill。 user: Sender (untrusted metadata):
{
"label": "openclaw-control-ui",
"id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}
[Tue 2026-03-10 13:53 GMT+8] clawhub install self-improving --workdir /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults
✔ OK. Installed self-improving -> /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/skills/self-improving| 我已经登录并且安装成功了。然后接下来我需要更新记忆系统了。将当前记忆系统给我介绍一下。另外mac-8机器已经下线(剔除记忆系统了)。现在我有一套新的工作系统:~/project/qmd-memory-gateway . 看下这个目录系统设计,我准备应用到当前的系统的openclawd上面去。另外我现在是要将 mac mini现在只有 mac-5,mac-6,mac-7 三个了,我觉得这个 ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 记忆系统适合每台机器有自己的gateway还是和之前一样使用mac-5共用一个gateway?
assistant: 我先看一下现有记忆系统脉络,再快速过一遍 ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 的结构,最后给你一个迁移建议。
assistant: reply_to_current 可以,我先把这三件事拆开讲:
1. 你当前 openclawd 的记忆系统,实际上是什么
现在这套更像是 “文件分层 + OpenClaw 内置 memory_search/qmd 检索”,不是一个独立的 memory-gateway 系统。
当前设计特点
- 入口层
MEMORY.md:长期记忆索引,偏 distilled summarymemory/YYYY-MM-DD.md:每日流水
- 专题层
memory/infra.mdmemory/projects.mdmemory/lessons.md
- 工作区层
- 你现在的
~/.openclaw/openclaw.json里配置了 qmd memory paths - 之前是把
shared、mac-5、mac-6、mac-7、mac-8都作为检索路径 - 现在你已经把 mac-8 从配置和 vault 里剔掉了
- 你现在的
这套系统的优点
- 简单,直接,和 OpenClaw 原生机制贴得很近
- 不需要额外服务就能工作
- 适合单控制面 + 少量节点
当前这套的短板
- 一致性弱
- 谁先写、谁后搜,不一定严格同步
- 结构上偏“文件仓库”,不是“查询前事务系统”
- 跨机器/跨分支隔离弱
- 更像“把很多目录丢给 qmd 去搜”
- 而不是按 branch/profile/workspace 做强隔离
- 写入规范还在,但检索入口不够强约束
- 容易出现“搜到了,但不知道是哪个时点、哪个分支、哪个任务态”的问题
2. ~/project/qmd-memory-gateway 这套系统设计,适不适合你
我看完后,结论很明确:
这套设计比你现在的 OpenClaw 记忆系统更工程化,也更适合你这种多机、多任务、强调一致性的场景。
它的核心思想
不是“让 qmd 直接搜目录”,而是:
- Git 是唯一真相源
- QMD 只负责索引和检索
- memory-gateway 负责:查询前同步 + workspace 隔离 + 一致性保证
也就是这个顺序:
sync git -> workspace sync -> qmd update/embed -> query
这个设计我挺认同,原因很直接:
它解决了你现在最缺的三件事
1) 查询一致性
你现在最怕的是:
- A agent 读到旧记忆
- B agent 读到新记忆
- 然后行为分叉
而这套 gateway 把“同步”强行放进查询链路里了。这个方向是对的。
2) 分支隔离
它明确反对:
- 单目录频繁 checkout 不同 branch
改成:
mainmemory/YYYY-MMtask/<task-id>
每个 branch 一个独立 workspace。
这非常适合你的“长期记忆 / 月度记忆 / 任务记忆”三层模型。
3) 可追溯
查询返回里带:
branchcommit_hashsynced_atresolved_workspace
这个非常关键。
你以后问“为什么它读到这个结论”,就能追到具体记忆快照。
3. mac-8 下线以后,这套新系统该怎么部署?
你现在机器集合已经变成:
- mac-5:控制面
- mac-6:执行节点
- mac-7:浏览器/验证节点
mac-8 已经剔除了。这个变化其实让我更偏向一个结论:
我的建议:继续只保留 mac-5 一个 Gateway
也就是:
- OpenClaw Gateway:仍然只在 mac-5
- memory-gateway / qmd 记忆系统:也优先部署在 mac-5
- mac-6 / mac-7 继续作为执行节点,不各自跑自己的 gateway
为什么我不建议每台机器一个 gateway
1) 你原来的架构原则本来就是单控制面
你现在现有记忆里最重要的一条就是:
- 控制面唯一 Gateway 在 mac-5
- 其它机器只做 Node Host
这个原则其实是对的。
如果你现在为了 memory system 又变成每台机器一套 gateway,会把控制面重新打散。
2) 多 gateway 会把“记忆一致性”问题放大,而不是缩小
如果每台机器都有自己的 gateway:
- mac-5 一个 memory-gateway
- mac-6 一个 memory-gateway
- mac-7 一个 memory-gateway
那你马上会遇到:
- 谁是 memory repo 的真相源?
- 谁负责写入合并?
- 查询打到哪个 gateway?
- 分支同步谁先谁后?
- 各自 qmd cache/index 怎么保持一致?
这套复杂度对现在三台机器来说,不值当。
3) 你这个项目本身就更像“集中式记忆协调层”
qmd-memory-gateway 的设计本质是:
- 一个统一的 memory-gateway
- 一个统一的 git mirror / workspaces / qmd cache
- 客户端远程调用它
这天然更适合:
- 中心化部署
- 而不是多机各自一套分布式网关
4) mac-6 / mac-7 更适合作为“执行资源”,不是“记忆真相源”
它们更像:
- mac-6:跑构建/命令
- mac-7:跑浏览器验证
而记忆系统应该更像控制面基础设施,放在 mac-5 更合理。
所以我给你的明确建议
推荐架构
方案 A:我推荐
- OpenClaw Gateway:仅 mac-5
- memory-gateway:仅 mac-5
- QMD 服务:仅 mac-5
- memory git repo:集中放在 mac-5
- mac-6 / mac-7 通过 OpenClaw 节点机制被调度
- 所有 agent 的记忆检索统一经由 mac-5 的 memory-gateway
这套是最稳的。
不推荐方案
方案 B:每台机器一个 gateway
不推荐,除非你明确要做:
- 多控制面容灾
- 机房级隔离
- 每台机器独立自治
- 复杂的分布式记忆路由
你现在这个规模,不需要。
一个更现实的折中方案
方案 C:单 Gateway,多 agent memory namespace
也就是:
- Gateway 还是只有 mac-5 一个
- memory repo 里做多 agent / 多 machine 分层
- 例如:
shared/agents/mac-5-control/agents/mac-6-executor/agents/mac-7-browser/task/<task-id>/memory/YYYY-MM
这个比“每台机器一个 gateway”强太多,因为:
- 控制面还是统一
- 记忆空间又能隔离
- 查询前同步也容易做
这其实和 qmd-memory-gateway 自己 README 里的方向是一致的。
我对迁移的具体判断
适合迁移的部分
你可以把下面这些思想迁进当前 openclawd:
- Git 真相源
- branch/profile 驱动的 memory 视图
- workspace 隔离
- 查询前同步
- 返回 commit_hash / synced_at / workspace
- shared + per-agent 目录结构
不建议直接照搬的部分
你现在不需要立刻上:
- 每台机器独立 gateway
- 分布式 memory-gateway 集群
- 多个 qmd 实例分散在各节点
先别把架构做复杂。
结合你当前情况,我会这样定方向
新的基础认知
- mac-8 已永久下线
- 当前集群只剩:
- mac-5
- mac-6
- mac-7
- 控制面仍建议只保留 mac-5
- 新记忆系统优先做成:
- mac-5 上集中式 memory-gateway
- 其下管理多 agent / 多 machine 的 memory namespace
我对“当前记忆系统”更新的建议
你接下来应该更新的不是单一文件,而是这几层:
1) MEMORY.md
把集群角色从:
- mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7 / mac-8
改成:
- mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7
- 明确 mac-8 已下线并从记忆系统剔除
2) memory/infra.md
补上:
- 新的三机拓扑
- 单 Gateway 仍在 mac-5
- 准备引入
qmd-memory-gateway作为新记忆架构候选 - 原则:不在 mac-6 / mac-7 启第二个 OpenClaw Gateway
3) memory/projects.md
补一个迁移任务:
- 评估并迁移
~/project/qmd-memory-gateway到当前 openclawd - 先做单控制面版本
- 后面再看是否扩展 per-agent namespace
最终结论
我的判断很明确:
qmd-memory-gateway这套设计值得迁入当前 openclawd- mac-8 已下线,应从长期记忆里正式删除
- 不建议每台机器一个 gateway
- 继续保持 mac-5 为唯一 Gateway
- 新记忆系统应该做成:
- 集中式 memory-gateway on mac-5
- 多 workspace / 多 branch / 多 agent namespace
- mac-6、mac-7 继续只是执行节点
如果你要,我下一步可以直接帮你做两件事之一:
- 先帮你写一版“新的记忆系统目标架构文档”
- 直接帮你更新
MEMORY.md/memory/infra.md/memory/projects.mduser: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 2:08 PM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 06:08 UTC assistant: OpenClaw 集群健康检查异常:
- Gateway 健康检查失败
- 节点连接状态检查失败
- 当前报错:本地连接
ws://127.0.0.1:18789被异常关闭(1006 abnormal closure)
这次仍然无法确认各节点在线状态,所以我不能假设 mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7 正常。建议先执行:
openclaw gateway status
如果还没恢复,再执行:
openclaw doctor
user: Sender (untrusted metadata):
{
"label": "openclaw-control-ui",
"id": "openclaw-control-ui"
}
[Tue 2026-03-10 14:35 GMT+8] qmd-memory-gateway 这套设计值得迁入当前 openclawd mac-8 已下线,应从长期记忆里正式删除 不建议每台机器一个 gateway 继续保持 mac-5 为唯一 Gateway 新记忆系统应该做成: 集中式 memory-gateway on mac-5 多 workspace / 多 branch / 多 agent namespace mac-6、mac-7 继续只是执行节点|给我后续的操作步骤(完整详细)我需要交个本机的子执行。我给提示词
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-node-health.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10-node-health.md
Session: 2026-03-10 00:13:46 UTC
- Session Key: agent:main:main
- Session ID: b8adb290-dcfa-49f4-862d-c327dde8dfdd
- Source: webchat
Conversation Summary
user: A new session was started via /new or /reset. Execute your Session Startup sequence now - read the required files before responding to the user. Then greet the user in your configured persona, if one is provided. Be yourself - use your defined voice, mannerisms, and mood. Keep it to 1-3 sentences and ask what they want to do. If the runtime model differs from default_model in the system prompt, mention the default model. Do not mention internal steps, files, tools, or reasoning. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:01 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:01 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:09 UTC user: Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK. When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md. Current time: Tuesday, March 10th, 2026 — 8:09 AM (Asia/Shanghai) / 2026-03-10 00:09 UTC assistant:
assistant:
🛠️ Node Health Alert
Only Browser Node (mac-7) is currently connected (7m ago).
mac-6 (Executor) and mac-8 (Validator) are not showing as paired or connected. They may have been unpaired or the pairing was lost.
Next steps:
- Check if mac-6 and mac-8 are online
- Re-pair them if needed:
openclaw node run/installon each machine - Approve the pairing on mac-5 gateway
Should I help you re-pair these nodes, or do you want to investigate what happened?
Import from openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10.md
- imported_at_utc:
2026-03-10T07:53:38Z - source_path:
/Users/lingyuzeng/openclawd/vaults/memory/2026-03-10.md
2026-03-10
OpenClaw cluster connectivity recovery
- Verified that
mac-6andmac-7are reachable only when CLI commands explicitly use--url wss://bot.jmsu.topwith the configured gateway token. - Root cause split into two layers:
- Local CLI default path on
mac-5still triedws://127.0.0.1:18789, which failed with1006 abnormal closure/ECONNREFUSEDbecause the current gateway bind istailnetand local loopback was not serving RPC. mac-6/mac-7were initially on older node-host versions and failed remote execution withnode command not allowed: system.run.prepare.
- Local CLI default path on
- After upgrading both node hosts to
v2026.3.8, explicit remote control viawss://bot.jmsu.topsucceeded. - Validation after upgrade:
openclaw nodes status --connected --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token>showed both nodes paired and connected.openclaw nodes run --node "Executor Node (mac-6)" --raw "echo ok" --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token>returnedok.openclaw nodes run --node "Browser Node (mac-7)" --raw "echo ok" --url wss://bot.jmsu.top --token <configured-token>returnedok.
- Remaining issue:
openclaw healthonmac-5still follows the local default path and fails againstws://127.0.0.1:18789; this means local default control routing is still misaligned with the active remote ingress path.
- Durable lesson:
- For this deployment, remote control path (
wss://bot.jmsu.top) can be healthy while local default CLI health checks still fail. - When node connectivity looks broken, first separate: (1) gateway path selection, (2) node-host version compatibility.
- For this deployment, remote control path (