Add Warp ACP provider design and ops docs

This commit is contained in:
hotwa
2026-03-17 19:53:58 +08:00
parent 067e38f7e8
commit 298a77bd0e
3 changed files with 337 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
# Warp ACP Ops
## Current Phase
Phase 1 standardizes Warp-backed ACP usage for `opencode` only.
## Current Secret Source
Primary secret file:
- `~/.openclaw/.env`
Current placeholder variables:
- `WARP_INFINI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_INFINI_BASE_URL`
- `WARP_CKIMI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_CKIMI_BASE_URL`
This file should contain real values locally, but memory documents must never store actual secrets.
## Why `~/.openclaw/.env` instead of `~/.zshrc`
Observed behavior on `mac-5`: current OpenClaw / exec / ACP-related process paths do not reliably inherit environment variables from `~/.zshrc`. Therefore Warp provider secrets must be loaded explicitly by wrapper scripts or service environment, not assumed from interactive shell startup.
## Planned `opencode` ACP Agent Ids
Use provider-qualified names, not model-only names.
- `opencode-warp-infini-kimi`
- `opencode-warp-infini-minimax`
- `opencode-warp-infini-glm`
Future provider examples:
- `opencode-warp-ckimi-kimi`
## Wrapper Policy
Each Warp-backed `opencode` ACP agent should launch through a dedicated wrapper script.
Suggested wrapper locations:
- `~/.local/bin/opencode-warp-infini-kimi-acp`
- `~/.local/bin/opencode-warp-infini-minimax-acp`
- `~/.local/bin/opencode-warp-infini-glm-acp`
Each wrapper should:
1. load `~/.openclaw/.env`
2. verify required env vars exist
3. fix provider + model mapping
4. run `opencode-ai acp`
## Key Files
### OpenClaw
- `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json`
- purpose: allow ACP agent ids and overall runtime policy
### acpx
- `~/.acpx/config.json`
- purpose: map ACP `agentId` values to wrapper commands
### opencode
- `~/.config/opencode/opencode.json`
- purpose: harness provider/model behavior where needed
### secrets
- `~/.openclaw/.env`
- purpose: provider secret and base URL storage
## Fallback Operating Rule
If a Warp-backed provider fails due to quota exhaustion, weekly limit exhaustion, rate limiting, or model unavailability during an ACP task, do not treat that as a dead end. Route to the documented fallback.
Fallback order:
1. same model, other provider
2. same provider, adjacent model
3. other provider, adjacent model
## Example Fallback Skeleton
For `opencode-warp-infini-kimi`:
- primary: `infini / kimi-k2.5`
- fallback candidate: `ckimi / kimi-k2.5`
- fallback candidate: `infini / glm-5`
- fallback candidate: `infini / minimax-m2.5`
For `opencode-warp-infini-glm`:
- primary: `infini / glm-5`
- fallback candidate: another provider with `glm-5`
- fallback candidate: `infini / kimi-k2.5`
- fallback candidate: `infini / minimax-m2.5`
## Testing Checklist (for later execution)
1. Confirm `~/.openclaw/.env` exists on each machine
2. Confirm wrapper can load env successfully
3. Confirm `opencode` direct provider call works
4. Confirm ACP agent alias works through `acpx`
5. Confirm OpenClaw can invoke the ACP agent id
6. Record success/failure in daily notes
## Documentation Rule
Whenever a new Warp provider is added:
1. add new `WARP_<PROVIDER>_*` variable names to the ops doc
2. add/update fallback chains in the long-term project doc
3. add the corresponding `opencode-warp-<provider>-<model>` naming entry
4. document the change in daily notes

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,28 @@
## OpenClaw / oMLX / subagent 配置记录
## Warp / ACP / opencode 规范草案
- 已决定长期文档主名采用 `warp-acp-*`
- 第一阶段仅先标准化 `opencode` 的 Warp ACP 接入;后续再扩展到 `gemini cli``claude code`
- 已新增本地 secrets 文件占位:`~/.openclaw/.env`
- 当前预置的 provider 环境变量名:
- `WARP_INFINI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_INFINI_BASE_URL`
- `WARP_CKIMI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_CKIMI_BASE_URL`
- 已确定provider 级别用环境变量命名,**不**用模型名命名,避免不同 provider 出现同名模型时冲突
- 已确定 `opencode` 的 Warp ACP agent 命名规范采用 provider-qualified 形式:
- `opencode-warp-infini-kimi`
- `opencode-warp-infini-minimax`
- `opencode-warp-infini-glm`
- 已确定 wrapper 方案为后续 ACP 稳定注入点wrapper 显式读取 `~/.openclaw/.env`,不依赖 `~/.zshrc`
- 已将 fallback 纳入规范设计:当 provider 配额耗尽、限流或模型不可用时,优先同模型跨 provider fallback其次同 provider 跨相邻模型 fallback
- 新增长期设计文档:`shared/long-term/projects/warp-acp-integration.md`
- 新增 OpenClaw 私域操作文档:`agents/openclaw-main/warp-acp-ops.md`
## OpenClaw / oMLX / subagent 配置记录
- mac-5 / mac-6 / mac-7 三台机器都已安装并运行 `oMLX`,模型权重统一放在 `~/MLXModels`
- 三台机器都存在 `com.lingyuzeng.omlx` 的 launchd plist用于开机自动启动 oMLX 服务
- 三台机器的 oMLX OpenAI 兼容接口分别为:

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
# Warp ACP Integration
## Purpose
This document defines the long-term design for routing ACP harnesses through Warp-managed cloud providers. Phase 1 standardizes `opencode`; future phases may extend the same pattern to `gemini cli` and `claude code`.
## Scope
- Control plane: OpenClaw on `mac-5`
- Execution nodes: `mac-6`, `mac-7`
- Current phase: `opencode`
- Future candidates: `gemini cli`, `claude code`
## Core Design Principles
1. **Provider identity and model identity are different things.**
- Model names can repeat across providers.
- Environment variables and agent ids must therefore encode the **provider**, not just the model.
2. **Do not rely on `~/.zshrc` for ACP runtime secrets.**
- ACP / acpx / harness execution may not inherit interactive shell startup files.
- Secrets should be loaded explicitly.
3. **Secrets and routing rules should be separated.**
- Secrets live in `~/.openclaw/.env`.
- Routing / alias / model selection live in ACP config, wrapper scripts, and documented policy.
4. **Wrapper scripts are the stable injection point.**
- Wrapper scripts should explicitly load `~/.openclaw/.env`, validate required variables, and then exec the target harness.
5. **Fallback must be designed up front.**
- Cloud provider quota exhaustion and rate limiting are expected operating conditions, not edge cases.
## Secret Storage Standard
Primary local secret file:
- `~/.openclaw/.env`
Recommended format:
```bash
WARP_INFINI_API_KEY=
WARP_INFINI_BASE_URL=https://cloud.infini-ai.com/maas/coding/v1
WARP_CKIMI_API_KEY=
WARP_CKIMI_BASE_URL=
```
Notes:
- Use plain `KEY=value` lines.
- Do not store secrets in `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json`, `~/.acpx/config.json`, or long-term memory files.
- Restrict file permissions: `chmod 600 ~/.openclaw/.env`.
## Environment Variable Naming Rule
Use the pattern:
- `WARP_<PROVIDER>_API_KEY`
- `WARP_<PROVIDER>_BASE_URL`
Examples:
- `WARP_INFINI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_INFINI_BASE_URL`
- `WARP_CKIMI_API_KEY`
- `WARP_CKIMI_BASE_URL`
Do **not** name variables by model alone, because identical model names may exist on multiple providers.
## Agent Naming Standard
For Warp-backed ACP harnesses, use:
- `<harness>-warp-<provider>-<model-family>`
Phase 1 examples for `opencode`:
- `opencode-warp-infini-kimi`
- `opencode-warp-infini-minimax`
- `opencode-warp-infini-glm`
Future examples:
- `gemini-warp-infini-kimi`
- `claude-warp-ckimi-kimi`
## Configuration Layer Responsibilities
### OpenClaw
Responsible for:
- Allowing ACP agent ids to be called
- High-level routing policy
Key file:
- `~/.openclaw/openclaw.json`
### acpx
Responsible for:
- Mapping ACP `agentId` to a concrete command
Key file:
- `~/.acpx/config.json`
### Wrapper scripts
Responsible for:
- Loading `~/.openclaw/.env`
- Validating provider secrets / URLs
- Fixing provider and model selection
- Launching the harness ACP command
Suggested location:
- `~/.local/bin/`
### Harness config (`opencode` in phase 1)
Responsible for:
- Harness-specific provider usage and model invocation details
Key file:
- `~/.config/opencode/opencode.json`
## Wrapper Contract
Every Warp-backed ACP wrapper should:
1. Load `~/.openclaw/.env`
2. Validate that required variables exist
3. Select the target provider
4. Pin the intended model
5. Launch the harness ACP entrypoint
6. Fail fast with a readable error if env/config is missing
Pseudo-flow:
```bash
set -a
source ~/.openclaw/.env
set +a
# validate WARP_<PROVIDER>_API_KEY and WARP_<PROVIDER>_BASE_URL
# select model
exec opencode-ai acp
```
## Fallback Policy
### Why fallback exists
Warp-backed cloud providers may fail due to:
- 5-hour quota exhaustion
- weekly quota exhaustion
- rate limiting / throttling
- transient upstream 5xx
- model retirement or temporary unavailability
- provider auth / billing issues
These are normal operational conditions and must be documented as first-class routing rules.
### Fallback priority
When a primary provider/model is unavailable, use this order:
1. **Same model, different provider**
2. **Same provider, adjacent model**
3. **Different provider, adjacent model**
This preserves behavior consistency as much as possible before changing model family.
### Example fallback chain
For `opencode-warp-infini-kimi`:
1. primary: `infini / kimi-k2.5`
2. fallback-1: another provider offering `kimi-k2.5` (for example `ckimi / kimi-k2.5`)
3. fallback-2: `infini / glm-5`
4. fallback-3: `infini / minimax-m2.5`
Exact fallback order should be documented per agent as providers are added.
## Operational Reminder
If runtime errors show quota exhaustion or provider-specific capacity limits during an ACP task, the operator should treat that as a routing event, not just a task failure. The next step is to move to the documented fallback provider/model path.
## Extension Path
After `opencode` stabilizes, the same naming / secret-loading / fallback framework should be reused for:
- `gemini cli`
- `claude code`
The framework should stay provider-centric and wrapper-based even as the harnesses differ.